First off, the thread isn't deleted, it's here.
Second, I'll repost what I said there:
Seriously, you're wigging out about something that should be pretty readily apparent. And you're insulting this site, its owner, and its administators because you didn't realize this stuff.
This outrage of yours is ridiculous.
Second, I'll repost what I said there:
Murphy wrote:
Wait, you mean that a website that can be viewed almost in its entirety without logging in has information available to the public?
WHY WAS I NOT TOLD THAT PUBLIC THINGS ARE NOT PRIVATE
Wait, you mean that a website that can be viewed almost in its entirety without logging in has information available to the public?
WHY WAS I NOT TOLD THAT PUBLIC THINGS ARE NOT PRIVATE
Seriously, you're wigging out about something that should be pretty readily apparent. And you're insulting this site, its owner, and its administators because you didn't realize this stuff.
This outrage of yours is ridiculous.
13 years